Many
theories have been presented explaining the motivation of fraud, bribery and
corruption. Specifically, it has been
suggested that:
- Differential Association Theory explains why fraud occurs by groups;
- General Strain Theory explain why fraud occurs by individuals; and
- Cressey’s Fraud Triangle address both.
Ernst & Young’s illustration of The
Fraud Triangle (Cressey, 1953)
The
pressure placed on employees can create the perception of justification of the
fraud. Categories of pressure include:
- Financial pressure; or
- Non-financial pressure, encompassing:
- Work-related pressure;
- Vices; and
- Pressure associated with individuals wish to live a luxurious lifestyle (Lokanan, 2015).
The
following video explores the rationalisation of fraud (Pope, 2015).
From
an analysis of the theory, we understand the likelihood of fraud, bribery and
corruption occurring rises when the opportunity to commit fraud increases,
internal and external pressure increases, and internal controls decrease. It is therefore crucial that organisations
heed warning signs from employees.
References
Ernst
& Young. Cressey’s Fraud Triangle
[Image]. Retrieved from: https://blackboard.qut.edu.au/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_123312_1&content_id=_6144809_1
Lokanan, M. E. Challenges to the fraud triangle:
Questions on its usefulness. Accounting
Forum, 39, 201 – 224. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2015.05.002
Pope,
K. R. (writer), Anderson, A. (presenter). (2015). TED-Ed.
No comments:
Post a Comment